drill
B2 · Turkish4 min read

Resultative participle -mIş (adjectival)

Using -mIş before a noun to mean "having been …-ed" or "already …-ed"

what is it?

The suffix -mIş can function as a resultative participle — an adjective derived from a verb that describes a noun as being in the state produced by a completed action. When used this way it appears directly before the noun it modifies, as a shorthand for a full relative clause with -mIş olan. For example, pişmiş yemek means «food that has been cooked / cooked food», not «food that reportedly cooked». In this adjectival role the suffix carries no evidential or hearsay meaning whatsoever — that is a property of the finite predicate use of -mIş, which is a separate grammar point.

when to use it

  • Resultative state. Use it when the noun is in a state that results from a completed action: okunmuş bir kitap (a book that has already been read).

  • Passive resultatives. When the underlying verb is passive, the participle is formed on the passive stem. This is the standard way to express «processed / treated» meanings: dondurulmuş gıda (frozen food — from dondur-ul-, the passive of dondur-).

  • Lexicalised adjectives. Some -mIş participles have become fixed adjectives or nouns in everyday Turkish: geçmiş (past, former), olmuş (ripe; done), tanınmış (well-known). These behave like ordinary adjectives and should be learned as vocabulary items.

  • Reduced relative clauses. The participle can head a fuller noun phrase that includes its own object or adverbial, replacing a longer -mIş olan relative clause: yemeğini yemiş bebek (a baby that has eaten its food).

formation

Attach -mIş directly to the verb stem (or passive stem), following standard 4-way vowel harmony. The suffix has four surface forms: -miş, -mış, -müş, -muş. The resulting form is placed before the noun it modifies, just like any adjective.

verb stemparticiple formexample phrasemeaning
piş-pişmişpişmiş yemekcooked food
oku-okunmuş (passive: okun-)okunmuş kitapa read / already-read book
geç-geçmişgeçmiş yıllarpast years
dondur-ul-dondurulmuşdondurulmuş gıdafrozen food
yap-yapılmış (passive: yapıl-)yapılmış plana plan that has been made

The participle does not take person or tense agreement when used attributively. It is an invariable adjective: pişmiş yemek, pişmiş yemekler — the suffix itself never changes.

examples in context

Masada pişmiş yemek var.
There is cooked food on the table.
Pure resultative: the food is in the state of having been cooked. No hearsay reading is possible here.
Bu okunmuş bir kitap — onu daha önce aldım.
This is an already-read book — I bought it before.
Passive stem okun- + -muş. The noun phrase okunmuş bir kitap functions exactly like an adjective phrase.
Geçmiş yılları düşünüyorum.
I am thinking about past years.
Geçmiş is a lexicalised participle from geç- (to pass). It is now a standard adjective meaning «past / former».
Markette dondurulmuş gıda satıyorlar.
They sell frozen food at the market.
Passive resultative: dondur-ul-muş. The passive suffix -ul- is required because the food is the thing acted upon, not the agent.
Yemeğini yemiş bebek ağlamaz.
A baby that has eaten its food doesn't cry.
The participle heads a reduced relative clause with its own object (yemeğini). This is the -mIş olan construction with olan omitted.

common pitfalls

  • Misreading the participle as evidential. Learners familiar with the finite evidential -mIş sometimes interpret pişmiş yemek as «food that reportedly cooked». This is wrong. The attributive -mIş before a noun is always resultative — it describes a state, not a reported event. Evidential force belongs exclusively to the finite predicate use (e.g. Yemek pişmiş as a standalone sentence: «The food has apparently cooked»).

  • Using an active participle where a passive is needed. When the noun is the recipient of the action, the passive stem is required. Writing dondurmuş gıda (active) implies «food that has frozen something else», which is not the intended meaning. The correct form is dondurulmuş gıda (passive: «food that has been frozen»). Always check whether the noun is the agent or the patient of the verb before choosing the stem.

  • Confusing the participle with the finite evidential predicate. The finite form gelmiş in «O gelmiş.» means «She apparently came» (evidential, A2 grammar). The participle gelmiş in «gelmiş bir misafir» means «a guest who has arrived» (resultative, no hearsay). The surface form is identical — context (attributive vs. predicate position) determines the reading.

Quick check

Three sentences, graded here. Nothing is saved and no account is needed.

1 / 3

Bavuluma ___ kıyafetleri çıkarmak için yarım saat harcadım. (doldur-)

Fill in the blank with the correct resultative participle (-mIş) form of the verb in parentheses.